<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meth Use Explodes in USA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rehabology.com/meth_use_explodes_in_usa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rehabology.com/meth_use_explodes_in_usa/</link>
	<description>Rehabilitating the Debate on Drugs</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://rehabology.com/meth_use_explodes_in_usa/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-65</guid>
		<description>meth use stats&lt;br /&gt;What a crock of crap.  The notion that more people use methamphetamine than smoke marijuana flies in the face of all reason, experience, and any previous stats published by anyone, anywhere, be they pro legalisation or a creepy drug warrior. 

This might be true in Japan. It is not true in the United States. 

 Why the editor of this blog would post this article without a heavy disclaimer is beyond me, but it might just be the blog format. I would hate to think that someone with any real interest in or knowledge of the subject could give this article much credence. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meth use stats<br />What a crock of crap.  The notion that more people use methamphetamine than smoke marijuana flies in the face of all reason, experience, and any previous stats published by anyone, anywhere, be they pro legalisation or a creepy drug warrior. </p>
<p>This might be true in Japan. It is not true in the United States. </p>
<p> Why the editor of this blog would post this article without a heavy disclaimer is beyond me, but it might just be the blog format. I would hate to think that someone with any real interest in or knowledge of the subject could give this article much credence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
